search

Nathan Ponwith vs Brandon Lam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Lam analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Nathan Ponwith vs Brandon Lam Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Lam

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 50.68% of points on their second serve, while Lam has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 50.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lam has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 55.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lam has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 30.77% of matches played (W/L 16/ 36), with Lam winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Lam has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 6/ 24), where as Lam has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 1 times and Lam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Lam winning 0. The last match between Ponwith and Lam was at the USA F1 (Los Angeles), 01-01-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 6-2 7-6(2).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Lam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Lam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 1, and Lam 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.37 while Lam has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lam has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 41.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lam has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Nathan Ponwith

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

752

Rank

367

High

26

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

High

26

Age

Plays

Brandon Lam

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L L L W W L W W L

Form

W L L W L L L W L L

56% (170-136)

Career Total W/L

41% (9-13)

44% (11-14)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Ponwith VS Lam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Nathan Ponwith Brandon Lam
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 8
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Ponwith VS Lam H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 7-6(2)

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Nathan Ponwith Brandon Lam
YTD W/L 44% (11/14) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 43% (24/32) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 47% (246/276) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (9/9) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 40% (2/3) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.24 0
Aces Total 60 0
DFs per game 0.38 0
DFs Total 98 0
Avg Match Time 1:48:50 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 222.48 0
1st Serve % 57% (985/1719) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 65% (637/985) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 51% (372/734) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 41% (62/150) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 39% (647/1658) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 29% (2/5) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 50% (9/9) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 44% (11/25) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 71% (5/7) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 67% (4/6) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 82% (11/9) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 18% (11/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 14% (14/2) 0% (0/0)

Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71% ( 36 of 51)
1st Serve %
58% ( 30 of 52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 19 of 30)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
27% ( 14 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 26 of 52)
63
Total Points Won
40
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57% ( 58 of 101)
1st Serve %
59% ( 52 of 88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59% ( 34 of 58)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 34 of 52)
44% ( 19 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 15 of 36)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
48% ( 48 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 39 of 88)
92
Total Points Won
97
W
6-4 1-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Harsh Parikh
57% ( 31 of 54)
1st Serve %
46% ( 25 of 54)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 18 of 25)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 10 of 29)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
30% ( 16 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 26 of 54)
64
Total Points Won
44
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63% ( 47 of 75)
1st Serve %
58% ( 32 of 55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60% ( 28 of 47)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 21 of 32)
61% ( 17 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 4 of 23)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
40% ( 30 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 30 of 55)
75
Total Points Won
55
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50% ( 30 of 60)
1st Serve %
68% ( 39 of 57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 21 of 39)
53% ( 16 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
37% ( 22 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 28 of 57)
66
Total Points Won
51
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60% ( 25 of 42)
1st Serve %
59% ( 29 of 49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92% ( 23 of 25)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
19% ( 8 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 27 of 49)
61
Total Points Won
30
W
6-0 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve %
54% ( 38 of 71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78% ( 28 of 36)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 25 of 38)
69% ( 9 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 12 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 71)
68
Total Points Won
52
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62% ( 38 of 61)
1st Serve %
48% ( 31 of 65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61% ( 23 of 38)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 15 of 31)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
43% ( 26 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 37 of 65)
72
Total Points Won
54
L
6-0 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
60% ( 29 of 48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
41% ( 21 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 29 of 48)
59
Total Points Won
40
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60% ( 61 of 102)
1st Serve %
69% ( 64 of 93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70% ( 43 of 61)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 42 of 64)
54% ( 22 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
36% ( 37 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 37 of 93)
102
Total Points Won
93
W
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 H2H

Brandon Lam Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
Q2
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
W
2-6 7-6(3) 10-5 H2H
Q1
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
Q1
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Axel Nefve
Player
Brandon Lam
64% ( 35 of 55)
1st Serve %
57% ( 39 of 68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71% ( 25 of 35)
1st Serve Won
38% ( 15 of 39)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
36% ( 20 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 36 of 68)
71
Total Points Won
52
L
6-1 4-6 10-4 H2H
Q1
W
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
Q1
L
7-5 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Sam Riffice
Player
Brandon Lam
53% ( 20 of 38)
1st Serve %
52% ( 22 of 42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
80% ( 16 of 20)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
20% ( 4 of 20)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 11 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 28 of 42)
55
Total Points Won
25
L
6-0 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Brandon Lam
Player
Alessandro-Damiano Ventre
53% ( 37 of 70)
1st Serve %
67% ( 42 of 63)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
70% ( 26 of 37)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 32 of 42)
55% ( 18 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
37% ( 26 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 22 of 63)
66
Total Points Won
67
W
5-7 5-3 ret. H2H

Ponwith Vs Lam Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions